Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 21%).
- Tromso held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 347 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |