Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 1.14, Δ 0.03).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 392Lead | Accurate passes | 335 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 404 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |