Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 2.70, Δ 1.87).
- Tromso fired more attempts (22 vs 6 shots).
- Tromso held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.70Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 307 | Accurate passes | 563Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 659Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.42 | Goals prevented | -0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.