Match statistics snapshot
- Valerenga created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 1.53, Δ 0.95).
- Valerenga fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.53Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 264 | Accurate passes | 518Lead |
| 350 | Total passes | 621Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.54 | Goals prevented | -0.54 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |