Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 2.25, Δ 0.91).
- Viking fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.25Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 360 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |