Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 3.67, Δ 2.41).
- Viking fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.67Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 527Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |