Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 1.68, Δ 0.66).
- Viking fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.24 | Goals prevented | -1.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ham-kam | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |