Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (2.35 vs 2.98, Δ 0.63).
- Hamburger SV fired more attempts (22 vs 20 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hamburger Sv | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.98Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15 | Shots inside the box | 15 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 20 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hamburger Sv | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 337Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 395Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hamburger Sv | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hamburger Sv | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.76 | Goals prevented | 0.76 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hamburger Sv | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.