Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- Hamilton Academical was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13 | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 6Lead |
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 277Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 383 | Total passes | 384Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.