Match statistics snapshot
- Hamilton Academical fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
- Hamilton Academical held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 360Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hamilton Academical | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |