Match statistics snapshot
- BK Hacken created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 2.94, Δ 1.28).
- BK Hacken fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Hammarby FF was more accurate in front of goal (78% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.94Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 340 | Accurate passes | 530Lead |
| 409 | Total passes | 597Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |