Match statistics snapshot
- Gais created the clearer chances on xG (0.28 vs 0.81, Δ 0.53).
- Gais fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Gais was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 0.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 629Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 708Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.