Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Gefle IF was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 55%).
- Hammarby FF held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gefle If |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gefle If |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gefle If |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gefle If |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Gefle If |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |