Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 1.03, Δ 1.01).
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 638Lead | Accurate passes | 185 |
| 720Lead | Total passes | 256 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |