Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Goteborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 2.34, Δ 1.04).
- IFK Goteborg was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 19%).
- Hammarby FF held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.34Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 441Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 269 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.