Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
- Hammarby FF held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 440Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 433 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.