Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 1.09, Δ 0.80).
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (26 vs 9 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 511Lead | Total passes | 428 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.