Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Hammarby FF held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 448Lead | Accurate passes | 361 |
| 517Lead | Total passes | 449 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.