Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 1.09, Δ 1.06).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 462Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 265 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |