Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (2.99 vs 1.33, Δ 1.66).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (20 vs 14 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 2.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 351 |
| 478Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.