Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 0.65, Δ 1.20).
- Kristianstad fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Kristianstad was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.65 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 284 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |