Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 0.35, Δ 0.60).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Norrköping W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Norrköping W |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 630Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 729Lead | Total passes | 275 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Norrköping W |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Norrköping W |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Norrköping W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |