Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (2.54 vs 0.58, Δ 1.96).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (12 vs 3 shots).
- Hammarby held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 2.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 551Lead | Accurate passes | 259 |
| 642Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hammarby | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.