Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
- Beijing Guoan held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 220 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 539Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |