Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (2.79 vs 0.43, Δ 2.36).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (26 vs 7 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 2.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 437Lead | Accurate passes | 228 |
| 511Lead | Total passes | 299 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |