Match statistics snapshot
- Buriram United fired more attempts (18 vs 17 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 319Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 418Lead | Total passes | 319 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |