Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (2.00 vs 0.43, Δ 1.57).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Henan Jianye |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Henan Jianye |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 283Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 361Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Henan Jianye |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Henan Jianye |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Henan Jianye |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |