Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Melbourne City was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 10 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 363Lead | Accurate passes | 179 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.