Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 0%).
- Persib Bandung held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Persib Bandung |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Persib Bandung |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 363 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 418 | Total passes | 466Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Persib Bandung |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Persib Bandung |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Persib Bandung |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.