Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 0.21, Δ 0.41).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (6 vs 3 shots).
- Qingdao Jonoon was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 1Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 175 |
| 581Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.