Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (3.41 vs 0.75, Δ 2.66).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (45 vs 6 shots).
- Qingdao Jonoon was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 3.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 26Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 45Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.