Match statistics snapshot
- Shandong Luneng created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.81, Δ 0.31).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 224Lead | Accurate passes | 150 |
| 336Lead | Total passes | 255 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.