Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 1.15, Δ 0.21).
- SHANGHAI SIPG fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 333Lead |
| 380 | Total passes | 428Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.