Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 0%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 537Lead | Total passes | 285 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.