Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 0.53, Δ 1.04).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 316Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 403Lead | Total passes | 247 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.