Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 1.17, Δ 0.62).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 476Lead | Accurate passes | 362 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 427 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.