Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 1.49, Δ 0.26).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 335 |
| 483Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hangzhou Greentown | Statistic | Wuhan Three Towns |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.