Match statistics snapshot
- Hannover 96 II created the clearer chances on xG (1.94 vs 0.81, Δ 1.13).
- Hannover 96 II fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Energie Cottbus was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hannover 96 Ii | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hannover 96 Ii | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 192 | Accurate passes | 354Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 442Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hannover 96 Ii | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hannover 96 Ii | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hannover 96 Ii | Statistic | Energie Cottbus |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |