Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Beitar Jerusalem was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hapoel Hadera | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 6 |
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hapoel Hadera | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 334 | Accurate passes | 362Lead |
| 409 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hapoel Hadera | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hapoel Hadera | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hapoel Hadera | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |