Match statistics snapshot
- Al Ittihad fired more attempts (23 vs 11 shots).
- Haras El Hodood was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 26%).
- Al Ittihad held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 195 | Accurate passes | 370Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |