Match statistics snapshot
- Haras El Hodood created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 0.83, Δ 1.15).
- Haras El Hodood fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Al Ittihad was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.83 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 428Lead |
| 456 | Total passes | 528Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.15 | Goals prevented | 0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Al Ittihad |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.