Match statistics snapshot
- Aswan Sc fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- Haras El Hodood was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
- Aswan Sc held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Aswan Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Aswan Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Aswan Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Aswan Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Aswan Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.