Match statistics snapshot
- Haras El Hodood fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Kahraba Ismailia was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 18%).
- Haras El Hodood held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Kahraba Ismailia |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Kahraba Ismailia |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 295Lead | Accurate passes | 199 |
| 402Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Kahraba Ismailia |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Kahraba Ismailia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haras El Hodood | Statistic | Kahraba Ismailia |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.