Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 217Lead | Accurate passes | 176 |
| 325Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.