Match statistics snapshot
- Harrogate Town created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.30, Δ 0.30).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Harrogate Town was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 221 | Accurate passes | 357Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 500Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |