Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 1.82, Δ 1.18).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 258Lead |
| 369 | Total passes | 373Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Harrogate Town | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.