Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 39%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 488Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 566Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |