Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 2.92, Δ 2.02).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.92Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 449Lead |
| 306 | Total passes | 516Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.