Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 2.06, Δ 0.78).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 521Lead |
| 358 | Total passes | 590Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.