Match statistics snapshot
- Haugesund created the clearer chances on xG (1.24 vs 0.84, Δ 0.40).
- Haugesund fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 547Lead | Accurate passes | 179 |
| 609Lead | Total passes | 255 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.